Help
Sign In
QaR
March 2009 
Am I a fascist?
Posted on Oct 3rd, 2008
by 
oraktoraeneo
oraktoraeneo
For this, I really need an answer...(FROM THE PEOPLE THAT VIEW THIS.)
Surely, this is an absurd question ... but it bears asking. Where I live, I have been called "a fascist" and "more conservative than Sarah Palin and John McCain combined (when it comes to my beliefs)." Now, fascism is defined by a stanch conservative/right-wing belief system. This current administration is fascist on its worst days - I am not! As for being conservative in my ideals and the like: I don't tolerate stupid!!!
Now, this piece is from a wonderful site that tends to be a little extreme to stupid, as well: "Tolerance means "putting up with evil", and consensus means "idiots rule". Nothing true has been found or established by consensus, which requires the profane many-folks to agree. The genuine Aryan [truth-seeker] is intolerant of all but wisdom and nobility, and takes no consensus, no matter how large, as true. The herd mentality and position can never, shall never, and has never been correct or close to the noble truth. To be intolerant of fools is the praise of wisdom. Those who are tolerant of fools are weak and capitulate to evil, just as if a man were to let termites feed upon the very timbers of his house; these types lack Aryan nobility; they lack the noble fortitude to defend the righteous and true." -Webmaster attan.com
But, what I have to wonder is, where is the line drawn? I don't worry about being annoying ... well, not much. There are genuine morons that control us, but it's becoming increasingly difficult to say that - with feeling - in this world full of passive-aggressive behavior, clutched in fear. The mind is wired to the status quo, and I can attest that anytime a dissenting thought flutters between my ears, my brain stops cold. Such ir-rationale isn't acceptable. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, I am constantly told, but where does that end before it becomes a danger to others OUTSIDE of their beliefs? If it's permissible, where can one call another on the fact that he or she is just plain wrong?
Surely, this is an absurd question ... but it bears asking. Where I live, I have been called "a fascist" and "more conservative than Sarah Palin and John McCain combined (when it comes to my beliefs)." Now, fascism is defined by a stanch conservative/right-wing belief system. This current administration is fascist on its worst days - I am not! As for being conservative in my ideals and the like: I don't tolerate stupid!!!
Now, this piece is from a wonderful site that tends to be a little extreme to stupid, as well: "Tolerance means "putting up with evil", and consensus means "idiots rule". Nothing true has been found or established by consensus, which requires the profane many-folks to agree. The genuine Aryan [truth-seeker] is intolerant of all but wisdom and nobility, and takes no consensus, no matter how large, as true. The herd mentality and position can never, shall never, and has never been correct or close to the noble truth. To be intolerant of fools is the praise of wisdom. Those who are tolerant of fools are weak and capitulate to evil, just as if a man were to let termites feed upon the very timbers of his house; these types lack Aryan nobility; they lack the noble fortitude to defend the righteous and true." -Webmaster attan.com
But, what I have to wonder is, where is the line drawn? I don't worry about being annoying ... well, not much. There are genuine morons that control us, but it's becoming increasingly difficult to say that - with feeling - in this world full of passive-aggressive behavior, clutched in fear. The mind is wired to the status quo, and I can attest that anytime a dissenting thought flutters between my ears, my brain stops cold. Such ir-rationale isn't acceptable. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, I am constantly told, but where does that end before it becomes a danger to others OUTSIDE of their beliefs? If it's permissible, where can one call another on the fact that he or she is just plain wrong?
Access: Public
